The NCLT Ahmedabad has clarified that a mere show cause notice does not create an enforceable debt under Section 3(11) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Understand the ruling, its implications for liquidation proceedings, and what it means for creditors and stakeholders in India.
The Delhi High Court has clarified that a Confirming Party to an agreement cannot invoke an arbitration clause unless the contract expressly grants such rights. Understand the ruling, its implications for contracts, arbitration agreements, and commercial disputes in India.
Are ICC recommendations binding under the POSH Act? The Allahabad High Court rules that ICC findings are mandatory, not advisory, and employers must implement them without discretion. Learn about the quasi-judicial status of the ICC.
Does loan restructuring require a new charge registration? NCLAT rules that restructuring does not necessarily modify the original charge if security remains unchanged. Learn how CERSAI and Regulation 21 protect secured creditors.
Can a Magistrate review their own order under the DV Act? The Kerala High Court clarifies that the power to grant an injunction includes the power to modify or recall it to prevent prejudice and correct judicial errors.
The Allahabad High Court clarifies that a mere show cause notice is insufficient for blacklisting. Read about the mandatory requirements for natural justice, specific grounds, and the legal consequences of vague administrative notices in India.
Can foreign exchange volatility help you cross the ₹1 Crore IBC threshold? NCLT Ahmedabad clarifies that the exchange rate on the Invoice Date is the only benchmark for Section 4 maintainability.
The Bombay High Court reaffirms: A mother’s care cannot be measured in money. Discover how this landmark ruling protects child rights and defines paternal maintenance obligations in 2026.
The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between ‘Seat’ and ‘Venue’ in arbitration. Learn why your choice of seat determines court jurisdiction and how to avoid litigation traps.
Digital harassment, public shaming, and online humiliation can constitute mental cruelty in matrimonial disputes under Indian family law.
In compliance with the norms laid down by the Bar Council of India we are providing only basic information. Any user of this website is warned that the contents stated herein are not guaranteed to be accurate, up-to-date or complete. JUS LAW ASSOCIATES disclaims all responsibilities and liabilities for interpretation or use of information contained on this website nor does it offers any warranty expressed or implied. The contents of this website shall not be construed as legal advise. The uses of the content of this site other than personal use are prohibited. The contents of the website is not an offer to represent you. The Website is neither intended to be nor is a source or form of publicity, advertisement or solicitation of work and any contract herein should not be considered as an invitation to establish Lawyer client relationship. By seeking information about the firm and its practice through the link displayed below, you acknowledge that the same has been sought of your own accord.
